United States vs Lee, 1982
And fuck you, Catholics.
Catholics, don’t you think your church leaders could do more to stop pedophilia than ‘banning’ priests from contact with children, especially when they know with certainty that these men are abusing kids?
A German Catholic priest has admitted 280 counts of sexual abuse involving three boys in the past decade, saying he did not think he was doing harm.
Named only as Andreas L, the priest told a court in Braunschweig that he had first abused the nine-year-old son of a widowed woman parishioner.
After being banned by his diocese from making further contact with the boy, he abused two brothers, aged nine and 13.
When the mother began to suspect her son’s relations with the priest were inappropriately close, she approached the diocese of Hildesheim, the priest’s employer, which forbade further contact with the boy.
The abuse of the two brothers then began under similar circumstances, the court heard.
After contact with these victims was also forbidden, the priest approached his first victim again, writing him a letter.
It was then that the truth about the abuse emerged.
“It was never my impression that the children did not consent,” the priest was quoted as saying at the trial.
Little does she know, one of my many Catholic videos/podcasts/songs will get to her some day. Mwahahahahaha! You have a crazy Catholic roommate sweetie. Sorry I’m not sorry. =]
It’s odd how you Catholic folk seem to only care about fetuses.
You have no compunction with giving ten percent (or more) of what you earn to a church that actively covers up child rape and abuse, up to and including your Pope. If I were you, I’d take that ten percent and donate it to organizations that help former Catholics recover form the horrific experiences they endured at the hands of your Church’s leadership
That would be a much more constructive use of your time and money. (Much more constructive than harassing your roommate with your mindless Catholic bullshit, in fact.)
Thank you for the message, Anon. I too have experienced many contradictions with the Catholic Church and its adherents, but as you saw from my post, the one that horrifies me the most is the systematic protection of sex offenders. (Which even the Pope himself has engaged in.)
So you don’t consider forcing churches to pay for abortions a violation of their rights? Yeh. Good job Obama. You FAIL. Only 390 days left…
Aren’t you a clever little shit?
Actually, let’s look at this logically. Catholics are completely cool with throwing health care out the window if it means that women can take a pill that would prevent a pregnancy. Health care, meaning, preventing sick people from receiving treatment they need.
Do you not even realize what an evil little fuck you are for thinking this is okay?
This is not an Obama fail, it’s a humanity fail on the part of Catholics. Granted, given the fact that they’ve institutionalized the protection of monsters that fuck little kids, it makes sense that they would support the forced impregnation of women. It’s a religion led by a member of the Hitler Youth who prances around draped in gold while people beg for food outside his palace, and dumb fucking cunts like you keep throwing your money into their 500 billion dollar pot for what?
And, as PFL pointed out, opposition to sex education is an opposition to facts, so perhaps you need to reconsider your fucked, antiquated point of view?
Fuck you, Catholic sycophant.
Look at what logically? How you just judged an entire religion based off of a negative stereotype? Maybe people would take your point if you didn’t insult all catholics. You think just because there are a few sick priests out there that makes all of them bad? You do realize we don’t support pedophilia right? Once a priest does that we’d like to believe they’re still good but even if it comes out that they are innocent they don’t get to stay a priest. I don’t appreciate you badtalking all of us just because of your narrowminded biased views against us. I hate it when people think that all catholics are rich and narrominded and strict. If I had a friend who decided to get an abortion sure I might be disappointed but if she thinks it’s the right decision who am I to judge? I’m not for abortion but why would I judge someone else, it’s their choice. And maybe you had a point and I might have listened if you didn’t insult my religion. Next time you want someone to see your point don’t make judgements against an entire group. I’m sure if I wanted to make a point and I used harsh language and insulted all “Protestants” or whatever religion no one would listen to the point I tried to make and I wouldn’t expect them too. How about you try again so people can see the validity in your argument?
Hey dumbass, did you even bother to read what I wrote? Let me summarize it for you, as it’s pretty clear you have reading comprehension problems.
Point one: Catholics are willing to throw health care out the window to prevent women from taking a pill that would prevent an unwanted pregnancy. (That’s what Plan B does, it does not affect existing pregnancies.) This is true, and it’s in the fucking article that you also did not read. It’s also fucking evil, and I could give a shit how butthurt you are about it, because there are real people with thoughts, emotions, and feelings who’d be truly injured if your church were to do this.
Point two: The Catholic Church has institutionalized the protection of people who exploit kids for sex and other depraved acts. This is also true, going straight up to the Pope, who himself has protected sex offenders. They do this by intimidating the victims and their families, spending a shitload of money on legal defense (some parishes have even gone broke doing this), and transferring them to new places, with new flocks to terrorize. So where the fuck did I say all Catholic priests are pedophiles, you fucking moron?
Point three: The Pope is the controller of a 500 billion dollar fortune, and does indeed prance about in golden robes with other opulent trappings, and he does have the sack to hypocritically criticize the poor and others while folks beg for food right at his door step. He’s a fucking hypocrite
I hope that’s easier for you to digest, cupcake. No where in there have I I hope that’s easier for you to digest, cupcake. No where in there have I accused all Catholics of anything, but it’s a fact that the leaders of the Catholic Church have zero credibility in the discussion about life and supporting life, and it makes me sad that you ignorant fucks hand them your cash every week.accused all Catholics of anything, but it’s a fact that the leaders of the Catholic Church have zero credibility in the discussion about life and supporting life, otherwise you fucks wouldn’t hand these evil bastards your cash every week.
A Catholic Church child safety co-ordinator who was in charge of investigating sexual abuse allegations was jailed for 12 months today for internet peadophile offences.
Christopher Jarvis, 49, a married father-of-four, investigated historic claims of child abuse, interviewing the victims when they were adults.
He was responsible for child protection at 120 churches and parish community groups for nine years.
He also, as a member of the Devon and Cornwall Multi-Agency Safeguarding Team, had access to police and social services information about victims of child abuse.
As a result of the conviction and sentencing, the Roman Catholic Church has ordered a review of child protection across the South West of England.
According to The Times, the Bishop of Plymouth, the Right Rev Christopher Budd, has asked the NSPCC to carry out the inquiry into child protection arrangements in Devon, Cornwall and Dorset.
The revelations that the church hired a peadophile in a key child protection role will add to the controversy surrounding the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales over its handling of sexual abuse.
At the time of his arrest in March this year, Jarvis was leading an investigation into an historic sex abuse allegation at Buckfast Abbey, a Benedictine monastery in Devon.
He was arrested after uploading images of pre-pubescent boys on to the Ning social networking website.
The only thing that amazes me about these stories is that people still allow their children within striking distance of these monstrous people and open their wallets freely to them whenever they ask.
Let me get this straight, you can spew hateful shit and in essence tell me I am a second class citizen and it’s free, protected speech, but if I said that your corrupt ass organization was a congregation of puerile, asinine, shitfaced child molesters, I’d be “oppressing” you. If I were to call your organization out for its numerous crimes against society, such as selling 300,000 babies, refusal to condone condom use as AIDS continues to kill people, the pope has been directly implicated in the cover up of a molestation scandal with 200 victims, I’d be “hateful” and “unforgiving”. You can literally be the bane of society and be holy but I can’t marry a female presenting person because it’s immoral?
Agreed, the apologists sicken me, quite frankly. I wouldn’t let one of my children within a mile of a Catholic church, as their own leader is a part of the massive institutionalized protection of these monsters who victimize innocent kids.