Another day in a Republican-Dominated State has me waking up to a state legislator endorsing hate speech.
Here’s the offending post. (It has such Republican staples as equating same-sex marriage with legalized perversion, equating taxes with legalized theft, and there’s a particular gem that equates ‘assault and battery’ with ‘attitude adjustment’.) That this person is a legislator in my state makes me particularly angry.
Here’s the letter I just sent Donna Lichtenegger in response to her pose:
Good morning, Ms. Lichtenegger.
I had the misfortune this morning to see the item you posted on your facebook page endorsing hate speech, and I am extremely disappointed to see statements like this receiving an endorsement from an elected official of the state in which I reside.
Would you be able to explain to me how you could possibly equate violence against someone as an ‘attitude adjustment’? According to the laws of Missouri, using violent means to settle a dispute is illegal in most cases. As adults, we have words and thoughts, and society largely expects that we should settle disputes using those, and for good reason. Endorsing vigilante violence, as we’ve seen recently, is an extremely slippery slope.
I’d also like to know how you equate taxes with ‘legalized theft’. I don’t know about you, but I rather enjoy the benefits that taxation brings. Better hospitals, roads, police and fire services, military protection, and in your case, a salary. Are you therefore stealing from me in accepting a taxpayer-funded salary, Ms. Lichtenegger? Being that your salary is funded by what you call ‘legalized theft’, I trust you will take every cent you receive from the state and return it so it can be distributed among the taxpayers from whom it was ‘stolen’.
And, equating multicultural areas with high-crime areas? Could you be more blatantly racist, and how is this at all acceptable for a legislator to say?
The cherry on top of this hate speech is your equating same-sex marriage with ‘legalized perversion’. I fail to see what’s perverted about two adults wanting to receive the same rights and privileges as their heterosexual counterparts when they enter into a lifelong, legal partnership. Furthermore, as someone who has had to pull a ‘Christian’ off of a gay person that they were assaulting in their hate, I know personally how damaging and harmful it is to say such things, especially in your position as an elected official. Your endorsement of this speech, to some, is a validation of their hate and prejudice.
Respectfully, you have the constitutional right to think and say what you wish, but I ask that you reconsider your blatant endorsement of hate speech.
I appreciate your time.
Sincerely,
Ryan Stevens